Explore documented public art commissions, exhibitions, artist rosters, grants and residencies. Compare selection routes and follow the original program sources.
A documented program is not a current invitation to apply. Selection routes and program history reflect the linked dated sources. Confirm current availability, eligibility and application terms with the organizer.
Showing 73–96 of 322 results
No matches. Try a broader search or reset the filters.
The commission establishes review procedures for proposed temporary/permanent public art and reviews gifts, with advice from art professionals, businesses and residents as needed.
OPED uses artist requests for expressions of interest and project proposals, with city mural policies and program partners; the retained 2026 RFEI cycle has a past deadline.
The commission advises public-project sites and professional-artist selection, reviews design development and approves final design before fabrication plus artwork, installation procedures and maintenance plans before installation. The published guidelines describe acquisition and project approval responsibilities.
Source checked
2026-10-28
Representative organizer imageImage: harriesheder.com ↗Project-page photo credits: Chris Barnes & Harries/Héder; exact photographer of this detail is not separately identified. (as credited at source)Public art commissions
The Public Art Commission chooses a project-specific selection method. The published examples use an art jury to shortlist registry artists, followed by a site committee interview, or paid site-specific proposals reviewed by that committee. Registry submissions are accepted throughout the year.
The city offers an artist contact list for later calls. A public-art application requests prior work or a resume, artwork and site images, and property-owner permission for commission review; this approval process is separate from paid artist procurement.
RFQs; artist selection panels and Public Art Commission review; historical Spirit Square call used SlideRoom.
Source checked
2026-09-21
Program context: An administrator connects artists with city and county projects · A public-art portfolio needs project evidence · Collaboration and public use belong in the artistic approach
CaFÉ qualifications reviewed by a project advisory panel; up to four finalists per site receive a paid proposal invitation.
Source checked
2026-09-21
Program context: The portfolio stage precedes paid concept development · Large airport budgets include delivery obligations · Different airport sites need different physical solutions
Representative organizer imageImage: lasvegasnevada.gov ↗Copyright 2026 by city of Las Vegas (as credited at source)Temporary exhibitions
The reviewed Water Connects Us commission uses an RFQ followed by paid proposals from three finalists.
Source checked
2026-09-21
Program context: Water Connects Us uses staged selection · Resolve the RFQ budget conflict before pricing · The organizer retains long-term maintenance costs
The CityArt Committee jury reviews artistic merit, creativity, safety and outdoor durability. The 2027–28 call used online entries and explicitly closed applications; the standing program remains an annual research target.
The county publishes project and gallery applications through its linked Submittable index. Selection, residency obligations and eligibility differ by listing; the current Wetlands residency requires county residency and age 18 or older. Gallery exhibitions and musician rosters are separate activities.
